Milliorn Blog

FAQ - When a borrower switches lenders
February 24th, 2010 11:41 AM

Thank you for contacting the FHA Resource Center, a response to your inquiry is provided below. If you have additional questions you can submit them via email to info@fhaoutreach.com or contact us at 1-800-225-5342. Please do not respond to this email unless you need further clarification or wish to initiate a new service request.

FAQ : When a case number is transferred with a completed appraisal, may a new appraisal be requested?

Solution Details : When a borrower has switched lenders, the 1st lender must transfer the case to the 2nd lender upon borrower request. FHA does not require that the client name on the appraisal be changed when it is transferred to another lender.

? In accordance with USPAP, the lender is not permitted to request that the appraiser change the name of the client within the appraisal report unless it is a new appraisal assignment. The appraiser cannot 'readdress' (transfer) the original appraisal report to another party and must perform a new appraisal assignment in compliance with Advisory Opinion #26 and FAQ # 74 in the 2008-2009 edition of USPAP.

For cases assigned on or after January 1, 2010:

? A 2nd appraisal may be ordered by the 2nd lender when:

1. The 1st appraisal contains material deficiencies determined by the DE underwriter for the 2nd lender.

2. The appraiser performing the 1st appraisal is on the 2nd lender?s exclusionary list.

3. Failure of the 1st lender to provide a copy of the appraisal to the 2nd lender in a timely manner would cause a delay in closing, posing potential harm to the borrower. Potential harm includes events outside of the control of the borrower such as loss of interest rate lock, purchase contract deadline, foreclosure proceedings, and late fees.

For cases in 1 and 2 above, copies of both appraisals must be retained in the case binder. For cases in 3 above, the 1st appraisal must be added to the case binder when it is received. In all cases, the lender must document why a 2nd appraisal was ordered and retain the explanation in the case binder.

FHA prohibits appraiser shopping where lenders order additional appraisals in an effort to assure the highest possible value for the property and/or the least amount of deficiencies and/or repairs are noted and required by the appraiser.

ML: 09-29


Posted by Mark Milliorn on February 24th, 2010 11:41 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Taken from PE.com
December 28th, 2009 7:45 AM
 

This watchdog for homebuyers has some bite


<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://cdn.robocaster.com/css/m-player-style.css" /><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background:url(http://cdn.robocaster.com/assets/player-controls.gif);width:200;height:15px" onclick="javascript:window.location.href='http://pe.robocaster.com/download.mp3?http://www.pe.com/business/local/stories/PE_Biz_S_harney27.38b4b86.html'"><tr><td class="player-control"></td><td class="player-center" style="width:114px">&nbsp<a href="http://pe.robocaster.com/download.mp3?http://www.pe.com/business/local/stories/PE_Biz_S_harney27.38b4b86.html">Listen to Story</a>&nbsp</td><td class="player-volume"></td></tr></table>
  Download story podcast

10:00 PM PST on Saturday, December 26, 2009

Had there been a federal watchdog consumer protection agency on duty during the early years of this decade, could it have prevented the housing boom and bust that put millions of homeowners into foreclosure and sucked trillions of dollars of equity wealth from just about everybody else?

Nobody can answer that question. But when the House passed the massive Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on Dec. 11, Congress took the first step toward creating a national watchdog for homebuyers and mortgage borrowers for any future boom cycles.

The 1,279-page bill covers a vast amount of financial territory. But for ordinary consumers looking to apply for a home loan, what it says is this: Next time around, the federal government isn't as likely to be asleep at the wheel. You'll be less likely to encounter an environment where unregulated pitchmen and con artists can sell you loans requiring no money upfront, no documentation, hyped-up appraisals and payment plans that drag you deeper into debt.

Nor will Wall Street investment banks be allowed to chop and churn poisonous mortgages into destructive investments for the capital markets, even if the bonds are rated triple A by companies that see and report no evil.

For buyers, the core of the legislation is its creation of a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, with broad powers to oversee and evaluate mortgages and equity credit lines offered by banks, mortgage companies, brokers and others.

Though no specific types of loans are prohibited in the legislation itself, the act almost certainly would limit or closely regulate mortgages that come with extra layers of risk -- teaser rates, adjustable payments, negative amortization, and options for borrowers to pay as little as they want per month.

The agency would also play a pivotal role in spotting discriminatory patterns in mortgage pricing, underwriting and marketing, from the steering of minorities and seniors into higher-cost loans to unfair denials of credit on racial or other prohibited grounds. It would essentially take over federal responsibility for the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and fair lending programs, and function as the go-to agency on unfair and deceptive trade practices in the financial arena.

On top of all this, it would monitor home real estate settlement practices such as under-the-table payoff schemes among realty agents, lenders, title companies, lawyers and others in exchange for business referrals. It would also get prime responsibility for making disclosures of loan terms to consumers meaningful and understandable.

The CFPA would have general oversight on home real estate appraisals and would be required to adopt rules and standards to guarantee "appraiser independence" from pressures by lenders, realty agents and others.

Once the revised appraisal rules go into effect, the controversial Home Valuation Code of Conduct mandated earlier this year by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be terminated. That code has been widely criticized for leading to lowball appraisals and valuations by inexperienced appraisers.

Significantly, the legislation requires mortgage lenders to "compensate appraisers at a rate that is customary and reasonable for appraisal services" in their local market areas. This is a direct response to sharply reduced fees now being paid to many appraisers by "appraisal management companies" that have mushroomed under the Fannie-Freddie code.

The CFPA would have a full set of teeth: strong powers to subpoena, mount joint investigations with federal and state agencies, file lawsuits, seek damages, penalties and restitution. Its penalties could range from $5,000 a day per infraction to $1 million a day.

Consumer organizations and fair-lending groups generally welcomed House passage of the bill, while banks and mortgage industry trade groups tended to be critical, seeing the entire set of proposed reforms as regulatory overkill.

Travis Plunkett, legislative director for the Consumer Federation of America, said that had the new agency been in existence in 2001 or 2002, it "would have been collecting data and complaints from consumers very early on," and could have issued regulations restricting high-risk mortgages.

David Berenbaum, executive vice president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said the act "is going to place consumer protection on mortgage and financing issues into the hands of a single regulator at the federal level," something that was absent during the rolling tragedy of the boom and bust.

On the sobering side, both Plunkett and Berenbaum said passage of final legislation is far from a sure thing. Action now shifts to the Senate, where industry lobbyists hope to either kill it or remove its teeth.

 

Posted by Mark Milliorn on December 28th, 2009 7:45 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
FHA Delay
December 23rd, 2009 3:22 PM
FHA Delays Appraisal Independence Implementation 45 Days

The Federal Housing Administration announced that it will delay until Feb. 15 the enactment of Mortgagee Letter 2009-28 and 2009-51 addressing appraiser independence and adoption of the appraisal update and/or completion report, respectively.

Originally planned for a Jan. 1 implementation, the 2009-28 guidance has two parts: the prohibition of mortgage brokers and commission-based lender staff from the appraisal process, and appraiser selection in FHA Connection.

In a Dec. 22 announcement, the FHA said the extension will provide the agency and lenders additional time to adjust systems to accommodate the changes to both ML 09-28 and 09-51. The agency said it would issue detailed instructions on changes to FHA Connection in a new mortgagee letter, but that the requirement for inputting the appraiser ID and the appraisal assignment date in the FHA Connection case number assignment screen will be removed. “Instead, lenders will be required to enter all appraisal data, including the appraiser ID, in the Appraisal Update Screen once the completed appraisal is received by the lender and prior to closing the loan,” according to the announcement.

All FHA Mortgagee Letters can be read online at www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/letters/mortgagee/ .

 


Posted by Mark Milliorn on December 23rd, 2009 3:22 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
National Assoc of Realtors HVCC Myths/Facts Brochure Attached
November 10th, 2009 4:38 AM

Posted by Mark Milliorn on November 10th, 2009 4:38 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Just received from the Texas Association of Realtors
October 14th, 2009 3:12 AM

Texans have the opportunity November 3 to vote on several important constitutional amendments.

The Texas Association of REALTORS® is urging people to vote for Propositions 2, 3, and 5.

These amendments will help ensure that tax appraisals in Texas are fair to property owners and uniform from county to county.

An e-mail misinformation campaign has been circulating that makes false statements about Propositions 2 and 3. The e-mail claims that passing these propositions will allow the state to start taxing homeowners. That is complete fiction.

Here are brief explanations of what these amendments will actually do:

· Proposition 2 will require county appraisal districts to value a home as a home. Currently, appraisal districts can use the "best and highest use" method to value a residence based on its potential use. For example, a residence in a neighborhood zoned for mixed use could be appraised at a higher amount for its possible use as a commercial property.

· Proposition 3 gives the state the ability to make sure appraisal methods are consistent throughout the 254 Texas counties.

· Proposition 5 will make it acceptable for two adjoining appraisal districts to combine their boards of equalization if they wish—an option that rural counties may find attractive.

Don't let this misinformation campaign hurt the chances of passing these important amendments.

If you need additional background materials to share with other Texas REALTORS® and consumers, you can access a layman's explanation written by Texas Association of REALTORS® staff attorney Gabe Lopez.

You can also read the Texas Legislative Council's thorough explanation on all 11 proposed constitutional amendments.

Finally, feel free to download a promotional flier for Props 2, 3 and 5.

Click here to read this Info Center item on TexasRealtors.com.
Please do not reply to this e-mail. This message comes from an unmonitored mailbox.

Posted by Mark Milliorn on October 14th, 2009 3:12 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
MLS 2nd Quarter Statistics By County
September 20th, 2009 12:12 PM

Posted by Mark Milliorn on September 20th, 2009 12:12 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Economic and Market Watch Report 1st Quarter 2009
May 27th, 2009 3:53 AM
Just added GDAR report by county in pdf file.  Let me know if you have trouble viewing.MLS 1st quarter Statistics_652009141928.pdf

Posted by Mark Milliorn on May 27th, 2009 3:53 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Interesting LA Times Article
April 30th, 2009 8:36 AM
latimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/classified/realestate/news/la-fi-harney19-2009apr19,0,6099613.story
From the Los Angeles Times

NATION'S HOUSING

Mortgage industry changes throw new hurdles in borrowers' way

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are tacking on extra fees for many loan applicants, while some lenders are going even further in tightening underwriting rules.
By Kenneth R. Harney

8:59 PM PDT, April 18, 2009

Reporting from Washington — Mortgage rates and house prices are down -- which sounds great for buyers and refinancers. But mortgage industry underwriting and appraisal changes taking effect this month are putting new hurdles in the way of borrowers and loan officers.

Take Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's add-on fees for loans purchased after April 1. In some cases, applicants are being hit with extra fees of 3% to 5% because of the type of property they want to buy or refinance, their credit scores or the size of their down payment.

Some major lenders who sell loans to Fannie and Freddie are going further -- tightening underwriting rules beyond what either corporation requires. For example, as of April 6, Wells Fargo, one of the country's largest mortgage originators, imposed a new minimum FICO credit score of 720 -- up from the previous 620 -- on all conventional loans purchased through its wholesale system that have less than a 20% down payment. It also began requiring a total debt-to-income ratio maximum of 41% -- down from the previous 45%.

Fannie Mae now has a mandatory fee of three-quarters of a percentage point on all condominium loans, no matter how high the applicant's credit score. For a once-popular interest-only condo loan with a 20% down payment and a borrower credit score of 690, Fannie imposes the following ratcheted sequence of add-ons: one-quarter of a percentage point as an "adverse market" fee; 1.5% for the below-optimal credit score; three-quarters of a percentage point for the interest-only payment feature; and the same because the property is a condo. The total comes to 3.25% extra, which can be paid upfront or rolled into the loan.

On top of these extra fees, borrowers are now starting to get hit with two sets of cost-raising appraisal rule changes. Fannie and Freddie have begun requiring all appraisers to complete an extra "market condition" report that includes detailed statistical analyses of local sales and pricing trends -- above and beyond the regular appraisal data. Many appraisers are charging an extra $45 to $50 for the time required to complete the form. Home buyers and refinancers can expect to pay the higher fees.

On top of that, beginning May 1, Fannie and Freddie are refusing to fund loans with appraisals that do not follow a set of new rules known as the Home Valuation Code of Conduct. Among the procedural changes: Mortgage brokers no longer can order appraisals directly, but instead must allow lenders or investors to use third-party "appraisal management companies" to assign the job to appraisers in their networks.

How does that affect the consumer? Consider the notification one Connecticut brokerage firm recently received from a major lending partner: Starting April 15, all good faith estimates provided to applicants must indicate a flat $455 charge for appraisals arranged through the appraisal management company. The broker previously charged $325. Consumers will now have to pay the appraisal fee upfront -- before any inspection or valuation is completed -- using a credit card, debit card or electronic fund transfer.

What happens if the appraisal comes in low and the applicants can't qualify for the refi or purchase program they sought? Tough luck: They'll have just two choices: Pay another $455 for a second appraisal -- with no assurance that it will solve the problem -- or cancel the application.

Jeff Lipes, president of Family Choice Mortgage Corp., which serves the Hartford, Conn., area, said the net effect of the underwriting, credit score and pricing changes was to "squeeze some people who are creditworthy by any reasonable standard out of the market."

For instance, as a result of the restrictions on condos, Lipes says "whenever we hear the word 'condo' [from an applicant], we shiver" because the deck is stacked against them. Even for prime borrowers with 800 FICO scores and 50% down payments, Lipes said, "I can't tell them that we're certain we can get you a mortgage."

A welter of recent rule changes from Fannie Mae has made some condo units in projects with commercial tenants or high percentages of investor units almost impossible to refinance.

In Naples, Fla., John Calabria, president of Bancmortgage Corp., said, "It has become such a nightmare to lend money" because of the layers of add-on fees, higher mandatory down payments and FICO scores. One high-income client sought to put down 25% ($200,000) to buy an $800,000 condo as a second home but couldn't because the minimum down payment on such a unit is now 30%.

"That's ridiculous," Calabria said. "Some of this just doesn't make sense."

kenharney@earthlink.net

Distributed by the Washington Post Writers Group.



If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives.
TMS Reprints
Article licensing and reprint options



Posted by Mark Milliorn on April 30th, 2009 8:36 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
HVCC
April 30th, 2009 7:30 AM

"The National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) states, there has been significant bipartisan movement forward by Congress on the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) as a result of the phone calls made to your legislators in-district offices last week! Key Republican and Democrat Congressmen have shown their support for NAMB's cause, and we need to keep the momentum going. We can not stop now! NAMB wants you to contact your Senators and Representatives TODAY, and urge them to stop or delay the implementation of the final rule promulgated by the FHFA, which implements the controversial HVCC." 

Reprinted w/o permission from www.fhaappraiserfinder.com


Posted by Mark Milliorn on April 30th, 2009 7:30 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
New York Times article raises concerns over the quality of low-cost appraisals!
April 3rd, 2009 5:48 AM

New York Times article raises concerns over the quality of low-cost appraisals!

Click on the link below to read a recent article from the New York Times dealing with the quality of residential appraisals in today’s market and focusing on fees paid to appraisers. The article questions whether the quality of the appraisal is compromised when an order originates from an AMC/VMC versus directly from a lender.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/22/realestate/22Mort.html?_r=1&ref=business


Posted by Mark Milliorn on April 3rd, 2009 5:48 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Milliorn Appraisal Company 8409 Pickwick Lane #390 Dallas, TX 75225
Phone: Toll Free Phone: Fax:

Staff Profiles | Contact Us | What is an Appraisal | Appraisal Code Information | Real Estate Links | Client Login | Order an Appraisal | Inspection Tips | How to Prepare | Home Seller Services | Home Buyer Checklist | For Buyers | Appraisal Myths | Estate Appraisals | Divorce Appraisals | Download Adobe Acrobat | Tell a Friend | Real Estate News | FAQ | Our Technology | Glossary of Terms | About PMI | For Homeowners | Why get an Appraisal | Services | Home | Bi-weekly Pmt Calc | ARM Calc | APR Calc | Fixed Rate Mtg Calc | Mortgage Points Calc | 15 vs 30 Year Mtg Calc | Mtg Tax Savings Calc | Balloon Mortgage Calc | ARM vs Fixed Rate Calc | Mortgage Qualifier Calc | Required Income Calc | Maximum Mortgage Calc | Mortgage Payoff Calc | Rent vs Buy Calc | Refi Interest Savings Calc | Refi Breakeven Calc | Mortgage Calculators | About AVM's | Mortgage Fraud | Why Order Online? | Faster Appraisals | Residential Investment | Appraisal Video | PMI Video | Technology Video | Sell Your Home | Inspection Video | Our Service Area | Interest Only Calc | Winterize your Home | Appraiser licensing | Appraiser ethics | Date of Death Valuations | Paying by Credit Card | Daily Rate Lock Advisory | Fax an Order | My Blog | Win $1000 | Dallas Appraiser

Copyright © 2010 Milliorn Appraisal Company
Portions Copyright © 2010 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map



 
State:
County:
City:
Zip: